Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Plagarism

Martin Stabe is a little angry with a student at Uclan who lifted a piece that he wrote for Press Gazette ont their blog without any attempt to cross reference.

The piece puts a good light on the Journalism department as it tells that three graduates from last year have successfully completed their training at the Sun.

Unfortunately as Martin says

"Journalism schools need to teach their students that blogs are internet publications like any other. They are public on the internet and can be read by anyone in the world with an internet connection. They are subject to the same media law as any other publication, including libel and fair dealing in copyright."

I suppose that this comes back to the debate about regulation of the blogsphere and whether there should be some code of conduct.


3 comments:

Adam said...

I'd suggest that it's a little more complicated than that. If nothing else, blog being published by large media companies are more likely to be sued for libel than individual bloggers, simply because they have money, while many individual bloggers don't.

Sure, they can sue me for a chunk of my debt, but they'd rather sue RBI for a chunk of its profits...

Nigel Barlow said...

Adam,

I agree with you on that point but I think this is more to do with a journalist's own moral standpoint.Surely it is best practice to acknowledge the source(s)of your story be it on a blog or in written published material.

Adam said...

Of course. Acknowldeging sources is always the best way to behave, unless naming them would cause serious problems for them (The Bill Goodwin case is the defining one here. He works a few floors away from me, these days...)