Thursday, April 09, 2009

The who will pay for what debate and ought we to find out

Run of the mill junk is a worthless commodity. High quality journalism is scarce and will be more so in the future, and that’s when everyone who loves great journalism will begin to pay.


Leonard Witt is convinced that people will pay for high quality journalism

Kevin Anderson
has read his post and says

Increasingly I’m of the belief that the newspaper industry is relying far too much on its values in its estimates of what readers value enough to pay for. We need some solid facts and figures on what people will pay for. I might be hoping for concrete data that just doesn’t exist right now, but I think we as journalists have to move from asserting what people should pay for and do a little reporting and research to find out what people will pay for and the types of services that might be able to subsidise professional journalism.

1 comment:

Sandy said...

hey, so i just finished reading this interview series with various journalists and high profile media folk. This one European guy was saying that American newspapers missed the boat on the "online game" And I kinda agree. You should check out the interviews, they are super interesting

Future of Journalism