Showing posts with label peter barron. Show all posts
Showing posts with label peter barron. Show all posts

Thursday, December 03, 2009

Plenty of life in newspapers yet

Northern Echo editor Peter Barron believes that there is plenty of life still left in newspapers.

Hold the front page reports that Barron,taking part in a debate about the future of the regional press staged at London’s City University said that,

We are obviously facing a digital future, but I still think newspapers have a future for at least 10-15 years."


Writing on his blog he continued

A paper like The Northern Echo still has a healthy, loyal readership and it is attracting more and more readers to its website.
Advertising is well down on a year ago, thanks to the recession, but showing signs of improvement - fingers crossed that the economy goes the right way.

Monday, August 04, 2008

What the media commentators are saying

In the Guardian Roy Greenslade in the wake of Asda's threats to magazines that it stocks take a look at the power of the supermarkets

The supermarket group Asda had demanded that magazine publishers should give the company free advertising and editorial space or face not being sold in its 300 British stores.
.

The group backed down later in the week but according to Roy his

research among publishers, all of whom asked to speak off the record, suggests that this episode is far from over. It has put the spotlight on the increasingly fraught relationship between them and some (not all) supermarkets.


In the Independent Guy Adams looks at the American market and how it could ignore a great news story

against this backdrop of falling circulation and a failing industry, the decision of every mainstream paper in America to ignore the juiciest political story of the month (and possibly the year): the discovery by National Enquirer hacks of John Edwards, in the corridors of a Beverly Hills hotel, where his alleged mistress and alleged love child were also staying, at half past two on the morning of Tuesday, 22 July.
and to him

one of the reasons America's newspapers are dying is their perceived pomposity. Readers say they are too timid to rock the boat; right-wingers complain (with some justification) that they conspire to suppress damaging stories about Democrats. The general public thinks they have simply become boring.


Whilst in the same paper,Jamie Merrill examines how the lobbyist are setting the news agenda and particular one,the Taxpayers alliance

Paul Lashmar, an investigative reporter and lecturer in journalism at University College Falmouth, sees a direct relation between the rise of the TPA and the pressures on news organisations. "Journalists are often now so overstretched that a lot of work that used to be carried out in the newsroom is carried out by groups like the TPA. You don't see extensive research anymore whereas it used to be commonplace in Sunday papers to have exercises where, for example, you would ring around every MP for their opinions as the TPA has done numerous times.


In the Guardian Peter Wilby takes a look at the political correspondent in the wake of the Labour leadership speculation

But to ask whether there were really any "plots" was perhaps to miss the point. Politics trades on gossip and intrigue, and ministers, and most backbenchers, are reluctant to move against a prime minister without the safety of numbers. Media reports therefore play a similar role to graffiti in a totalitarian society where public dissent is forbidden. They express a mood that may lead MPs to something more substantial.


And finally in the same paper Janine Gibson take a look at the other big media story of the week,the departure of Peter Barron to Google

Most likely - and I haven't asked him because otherwise how could I pontificate? - Barron saw a generation of controller ships open up around him, and either didn't fancy it or wasn't next in line. It's often the BBC way to keep execs hanging till they get fed up and leave.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Last Post for Peter Barron

Peter Barron off to the brave new world of Goggle writes his last posting on the BBC editors blog

The digital revolution means I've been the first Newsnight editor to look after a programme which can be accessed at any time of the day or night anywhere in the world. You can engage us in conversation and we can - and should - explain our inner thinking.
So I'd like to take this chance to thank publicly the brilliant, creative and committed team who put together Newsnight five nights a week. To thank the six million or so viewers who stick with Newsnight week in week out despite the proliferation of competing demands for their eyeballs
.

Monday, March 10, 2008

What the media commentators are saying

Roy Greenslade writes in the Guardian on the latest troubles for the New York Times.Whilst recognising that this is the first time the paper has been in trouble

The difference this time is fear about its survival as an independent, family-owned institution
and that

the growing fear that the paper that has been controlled since 1896 by a single family - the Sulzberger-Ochs dynasty - may fall into corporate hands and thereby lose the independence that has enabled its journalism to thrive


Steven Glover looks at another media dynasty in the Indpendent and asks

Newspapers are dead or dying, we are told. Why, then, is Rupert Murdoch, the most successful media proprietor in the world, investing £650m in state-of-the-art presses to print the Sunday Times, Sun, Times and News of the World?


In the same paper Newsnight Editor Peter Baron is interviewed and defends the shows biggest attraction

"Jeremy's got a toolbox of a whole range of different styles. Some interviews are looking for information, some are reflective, some are chewing the fat, and some are clearly putting people on the spot. We know from our research that viewers want us to be dogged in getting the answers to the questions. Jeremy is so appreciated because he's looking for the answers and is supernaturally talented at asking the questions that the viewer wants asked at the moment they want it asked. The idea that interviewing is default aggressive is a caricature."


And the Guardian interviews the controller of BBC 2,Owen Gibson, who tells the paper

"It's not a job I've ever aspired to or seen myself doing. It's been fascinating and a real honour. But I've never wavered in that
,