Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Breaking the law can be justified in certain circumstances

According to Brendan O'Neill the Guardian is a greater threat to our society than the News of the World.

Writing in the First Post,O'Neill says that

That oh-so-worthy broadsheet's campaign against the News of the World poses a potentially far greater threat to liberty and press freedom than anything the tacky Sunday tabloid might have done.
arguing that

If journalists did not sometimes break the law then the truth would remain hidden


Now that can be a fair point sometimes but when it appears that it is used for undercover celeb scandals or sportspeople then the argument is surely blown out of the water.

Roy Greenslade is quick to the defence of his employers as he writes that

The point about the News of the World's activities is that they were not investigating high crime and misdemeanours. They were not exposing police corruption. They were not acting in the public interest.
What O'Neill needs to grasp is that unprincipled and trivial journalism by the News of the World puts serious, inquiring journalism on the back foot.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Valuable info. Fortunatе mе I fоunԁ your site by chancе, and I'm surprised why this coincidence did not took place earlier! I bookmarked it.

Here is my page - how to flip cars For profit

Anonymous said...

We stumbled over hеre frοm a different ρage and
thοught I may as well сheck things out.
I like what I see so i аm juѕt following you.
Look forωard to going over yοur web page for a second time.


Fеel freе to surf to my blog post; dfw seo