Showing posts with label wikipedia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wikipedia. Show all posts

Friday, December 04, 2009

Digital divide and Wikipedia

Whilst crowdsourcing works wonders in places where there are plenty of educated earners,it falls down in places that underperform.

One such area is Africa,as Marginal Revolution notes

Almost the entire continent of Africa is geographically poorly represented in Wikipedia. Remarkably, there are more Wikipedia articles written about Antarctica than all but one of the 53 countries in Africa (or perhaps more amazingly, there are more Wikipedia articles written about the fictional places of Middle Earth and Discworld than about many countries in Africa, Asia, and the Americas).


via the Guardian

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Why crowdsourcing may be doomed to failure

One of the problems identified with this cconcept that we call crowdsourcing is the very fact that people get rather fed up with doing something for nothing over time and a rapid enthusiasm will eventually turn to apathy.

Maybe Wikipedia is going to be a prime example of this as this graph show



As Matt Buckanan says

The decay of time, bitter infighting, and the increasing scope and strength of regulations slowly strangle the life out of Wikipedia, with editors—its braintrust—fleeing in droves, even as traffic at the world's fifth most-popular website keeps growing

Friday, October 16, 2009

Wikipedia's top 100

i have just come across the 100 most viewed articles on wikipedia for this year

These are the top 10 and how interesting that You Tube,Wikipedia itself and Facebook all appear in the top 10

1. Wiki (131,383 page hits per day)

2. The Beatles (111,896)

3. Michael Jackson (79,734)

4. Favicon.ico (78,077)

5. YouTube (72,318)

6. Wikipedia (52,542)

7. Barack Obama (49,401)

8. Deaths in 2009 (48,758)

9. United States (46,545)

10. Facebook (42,679)

Ht-Stephen's Lighthouse

Friday, October 24, 2008

Manchester verison of Wikipedia

I see that Manchester now has its own version of Wikipedia.

Called Manclopedia.co.uk , it is

a free, open content encyclopedia project owned and operated by Hive Magazine. Its name is a portmanteau of the words "manc"(slag term for an inhabitant of Greater Manchester) and "encyclopedia". The articles contained within Manclopedia are written collaboratively by volunteers and almost all of its articles can be edited by anyone who can access the Manclopedia website.


Mind you there is not a great deal on it at the moment

HT-How do

Sunday, February 10, 2008

Can journalists trust wikipedia?

Thanks to Martin Stabe for this lead,

As journalist students we are often reminded of the dangers of using wikipedia in our research,the main concern being that the information contained within is neither accurate or verifiable.I,personally rarely use it prefering the more concentional search engines to get information.

Donna Shaw,writing in the American journalism review says

some journalists find it very valuable as a road map to troves of valuable information.
and according to Donna

Dismissed by traditional journalism as a gimmicky source of faux information almost since it debuted in 2001, Wikipedia may be gaining some cautious converts as it works its way into the mainstream, albeit more as a road map to information than as a source to cite. While "according to Wikipedia" attributions do crop up, they are relatively rare.

Sunday, December 16, 2007

BBC alters the truth again


We are told as Media students not to use Wikipedia for research and perhaps the Independent this morning shows us why

According to the paper



BBC officials repeatedly altered the Wikipedia internet encyclopaedia to water down attacks on the corporation.
An investigation of "anonymous" edits on the site has revealed that the broadcaster's staff rewrote parts of a page entitled "Criticism of the BBC" to defuse press attacks on "political correctness". Also included in more than 7,000 Wikipedia edits by BBC workers are unflattering references to rival broadcasters – and even the corporation's biggest names.


So 16 days of the year to go and how many more BBC revelations can we fit in