Showing posts with label digital future. Show all posts
Showing posts with label digital future. Show all posts

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Uclan places digital at the heart of strategy

Good to see that my former place of learning is championing the digital community.

How Do reports that

The University of Central Lancashire has created the new role of 'project champion for digital industries' as it looks to build strategic links between itself and the sector on a regional, national and international level.
adding that

Lisa Harding has been recruited to take up the post and direct UCLan's 'University Knowledge Transfer agenda for digital and creative industries'

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Which countries have the most wi fi spots.




It won't surprise you to know that it is America.

This from the Economist

WIRELESS internet is spreading extremely fast. Today business travellers have over 286,000 hotspots around the world at their disposal, compared with 53,700 five years ago, according to JiWire, a mobile audience media company. Reflecting its early adoption of WiFi, America has most hotspots, although China is adding networks particularly rapidly. Rich countries with the most tech-friendly cultures (such as South Korea) figure prominently. Measured per person, Sweden and Britain offer the best hotspot penetration rates.

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Internet rights v Pirate ones

Plans to make internet access a “fundamental right” are to be dropped, a move that paves the way for European law enforcement agencies to cut off web users who have been caught downloading pirated films and music.reports the FT this morning

The European parliament has agreed to drop an amendment that was aimed at countering so-called “three strikes” laws, legislation that allows law enforcement agencies to shut down internet connections that have been allegedly used for illegal file-sharing .

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Who would have thought a mango could cause so much debate.


There,I thought the headline might attract you,more on the mango shortly.

Yesterday I attended an interesting and lively discussion at the Zion Arts centre in Hulme Manchester.

It was organised by The Manchester Beacon who designed what they called Comixed as a way of bringing different people together to explore ideas collaboratively.

Five ideas were brought to the event and via blogs and twitter of which the one that fascinated me was the role of technology.

Prof. Jon Whittle, Chair of Software Engineering, Lancaster University put this question to the audience prior to the event.

Twitter, Bebo, Facebook, mash-ups, web 3.0, delicious…. where does it all end? Are all these new technologies really improving our lives? Or are they just a drain on our time and resources, keeping us away from the things that really matter….?
The time is ripe for developments in technology to change society for the better. There are unprecedented opportunities to solve some of society’s most complex challenges through the appropriate use of technology. But we must be careful to focus on substance not fads.
Unless we understand the impact of technologies on society, we may never fully realise their potential.


It provided some lively discussion which given the current trend's centred around social media.

The event was live blogged and you can read all five discussions HERE

But to the mango.Kate Bailey, Senior Research Associate, Food Process Innovation Unit, Cardiff Business School offered a lively debate on the sustainability of agriculture.

As global population looks set to grow from 6 billion to 9 billion, food production will need to double at a time where there are real concerns over the availability of energy, land and water as well as the challenge of climate change.


Hence the introduction of the mango.It to the audience symbolised everything about the argument.Should we be able to buy a mango in a British shop,or should all our food be grown locally? Should we be allowed the choice of buying what we want where and when we want or should government intervene.What about the carbon footprint of flying in a mango? But should we take away a steady source of income from the developing world?

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Now the billboard will get a makeover

The lastest medium to have a makeover in this digital is going to be the billboard.

That is at least according to William Eccleshare, the new chief executive of Clear Channel's international outdoor advertising business.

Interviewed in the FT this morning,he tells the paper that

"People have been sticking things on walls for centuries, but there's now a real opportunity to change the business,In 10 years, and probably in five, the outdoor market will feel and look very different from what it does now.


In what way? Well he continues

"If you get the economics right, you can make digital work," citing plasma screens in Finland's largest shopping centre, which can change advertising to suit different groups of shoppers passing through at different times of the day.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Nice idea but please redesign your web Bury Council

Digital Bury has been launched as Bury council say

In response to this growing sector and to gain a better understanding of it, together with identifying who is operating within it locally,


Digital Bury will inform, influence, advocate and promote the best interests of the Digital sector in the short, medium and long-term through events, web platform and active engagement with the companies, individuals and education.


A good idea in practice but I have to say that surely they could have done a better job with their site design

via How do

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

Sorrell fires a warning shot over digital Olympic coverage

The IOC has to embrace younger generations and "learn from the likes of YouTube or risk losing young viewers for life."

That was the opinion of Martin Sorrell from WPP Group as reported by Social Media today.

In a keynote speech on digital media at the International Olympic Committee’s Congress he also recommended that “If they are going online, you go online. You have to let them play–with your content, your assets–in their own way.”

and according to Sorrell

1.4 billion people had Internet access and four billion used mobile phones, but people with mobile wireless devices were “no longer satisfied” with just consuming content created by television networks. They wanted to make their own images and communicate through social networking sites, he said.


His conclusion?

We must ensure the iPod, iPhone generation is tuning in, not tuning out,


Ht-Martin Belam

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Words of wisdom from Jeff Jarvis

who writes that

I’d rather invest in a company that will take advantage of the new opportunities of the internet, not seeing ravages in the future but instead growth and profit. I’ve said often that protection is no strategy for the future. An industry whose strategy for the future is built on trying to keep us from doing what we want to do and resist the flow of the internet is an industry that is merely biding time. That should be the lesson they learn from newspapers and music.

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

How the net changes social and economic practices,

Obvious you would think?

Adrian Monck flags up a good piece by Tom Steinberg writing at MySociety who questions the government's digital strategy.

While it has focused on getting people online,protecting people against its bad points and promoting itself though websites etc they have missed some crucial points

The main one being its economic impact.

He writes that the medium

changes social and economic practices,technology effectively made it possible and much easier to be a big, highly productive company, to gather expertise and capital together and to target markets for maximum yields.


adding that services such as google

are reducing traditional institutions ability to charge for information, seize big consumer surpluses, limit speech or fix marriages. It has, in other words, become harder to be a big business, newspaper, repressive institution or religion.


He ends by suggesting five ways in which the government can contribute in a positive way.You can read all five on the post but I will repeat these

1.Accept that any state institution that says “we control all the information about X” is going to look increasingly strange and frustrating to a public that’s used to be able to do whatever they want with information about themselves

2.Seize the opportunity to bring people together.

Friday, June 05, 2009

12 good points on web economics

A must read post from Digital journalism lecturer Paul Bradshaw who looks at the consequences of how the web has changed news economics.

There are 12 really good points but perhaps this is the most poignant one

Sometimes people need reminding of the basic laws of supply and demand. From a limited availability of journalism to more than you can ever read, any attempt to ’sell content’ must come up against this basic problem.

Saturday, May 09, 2009

Universities are not controlling information any more

It appears now that we have a digital divide in our universities according to the findings of the Committee of Inquiry into the Changing Learner Experience:

Ht-Mark Comerford

This report in the Times higher education supplement says that

The evolution of the internet has produced a generation of students with "a preference for quick answers" and a "casual" approach to the evaluation and attribution of information,


One academic

expressed "strong reservations" about students' ability to critically evaluate information from the web.
and another said that

"Universities are not controlling information any more. What they should be doing is supporting students in becoming much more critical thinkers."

Thursday, May 07, 2009

Creating a digital divide?

This blog has talked about the digital divide before and if you are interested take a look at this presentation from Helen Milner (Ht-Paul Bradshaw)

Amongst some of the highlights.

The fact that 29 per cent of adults don't use the internet.35 per cent of homes haven't got it and that 49 per cent of D&E households don't have access to it.

Rather frightening.Are we creating a digital divide



Thursday, April 30, 2009

The net comes alive

An article in the New Scientist suggests that th einternet could become self aware i a decade.(Ht-Tim Difford)

According to o Francis Heylighen, who studies consciousness and artificial intelligence at the Free University of Brussels (VUB) in Belgium,

consciousness is merely a system of mechanisms for making information processing more efficient by adding a level of control over which of the brain's processes get the most resources. "Adding consciousness is more a matter of fine-tuning and increasing control... than a jump to a wholly different level,"
therefore it is quite feasible that

this turn the internet into a self-aware network that constantly strives to become better at what it does, reorganising itself and filling gaps in its own knowledge and abilities.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Digital clutter

Nicholas Carr writes that Tim Bray, the software writer is

looking forward to the fast-approaching day when he'll be able to get rid of his many books, leaving his walls even emptier. Their contents, too, will be digitized, turned into files that can be displayed on a handy e-book reader like Amazon's Kindle.

He writes: "I’ve long felt a conscious glow when surrounded by book-lined walls; for many years my vision of ideal peace included them, along with a comfy chair and music in the air. But as I age I’ve started to feel increasingly crowded by possessions in general and media artifacts in particular." Physical books, he says, "are toast," and that's "a good thing."


However all he will be doing is replacing one clutter with another

When Tim Bray throws out his books, he may well have a neater, less dusty home. But he will not have reduced the clutter in his life, at least not in the life of his mind. He will have simply exchanged the physical clutter of books for the mental clutter of the web. He may discover, when he's carried that last armload of books to the dumpster, that he's emptied more than his walls.


Ht-Andrew Sullivan

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

What the Kindle is really doing to the publishing industry

I have written about the advance of the electronic reader the Kindle before on this blog.
Is it a threat to the publishing industry,will it kill the centuries old tradition of book reader,will libraries be reduced to empty warehouses?

Maybe all three but its arrival has coincided with structural changes in the publishing world as this article by Marion Maneker suggests

The cutbacks that are happening in the publishing industry are not related to its entry

book chains are falling victim to the same disease that killed the independent bookstore. High-margin sales—big best-sellers that come in the back of the store in a shipping box and leave through the front with a customer in the space of a few hours or days—have migrated to other outlets.


However it arrival will coincide with a gap in the market by these structural changes.

The collapse of bookstores almost ensures that the Kindle will thrive.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

The digital future?

In these days of ultra digital technology it is nice to see this picture of how one house's internet connection is kept alive




Courtesy of an Englishman's Castle

Thursday, February 19, 2009

"It's not the skills that will get you that job."

Charlie Beckett has brought my attention to a piece in the American Online journalism review.

Written by Nikki Usher,it argues that skills training is not enough for the digital journalist.

Instead

As one news executive said, "We need to take staff to Web 2.0 and beyond – to make learning more nimble and flexible." This executive, after putting staff through training pilots, realized that multimedia literacy and a basic understanding of what it meant to work in a Web environment was what people needed – before they could go about learning the hardware.


So according to Nikki there are a number of areas which need developing

1. Journalists need to understand how the Web and multimedia goals will work within their own organizations. News organizations need to clearly communicate how these Web goals will influence the work production cycle.

2. Journalists at all levels of the news organization should believe that they can contribute to the multimedia vision of their organization. The future of the newsroom is also in your hands, and thinking like this forces journalists to think multi-dimensionally.

3. Journalists are not alone in the newsroom. Even if journalists themselves cannot think about how to make their work relevant to multiplatform content, someone else in the news organization can. Most of your organizations have people on staff that can help you brainstorm, even if you can't. Multimedia training is also about making new connections across your organization.

4. Silos, departmental rivalries, and departments that don't communicate with each other cannot exist if multimedia initiatives are to succeed.

5. Journalists no longer control the distribution of the content they produce. This is a very scary thought for many journalists, but the reality is that once something is published (usually on Web sites), it belongs to the audience of readers and becomes part of a conversation about the news.

6. Journalists need to rethink and reposition themselves the leader of this new conversation, which includes everyone from the traditional water cooler chat to bloggers.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Will the Kindle take over? I think not


I have never been totally convinced of the market for the electronic reader and the end of books and the printed word.

There has been much talk in the media about the latest Kindle product but it is worth reading Rob Horning's take on the matter

The preference consumers have shown for digitized music and iPods doesn’t seem to translate to books. The usefulness of the iPod derives from its ability to shuffle songs that many people enjoy as background, more or less passively. On the subway I hear about a dozen songs each morning, and it pleases me that they are randomly selected from a list of several thousand. But I wouldn’t want my reading material served up that way. Generally I’m reading one thing at a time, and I benefit from the finality of that decision, when I leave home with one book. Books have the great built-in advantage of preventing me from surfing away elsewhere when the reading becomes arduous or requires an effort of concentration.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Information overload-not necessarily


Is there simply too much information in this digital age.

It is a subject that has aroused the attentions of many but Tom Stafford dismisses the argument over at Mind Hacks (Ht-Richard Sambrook)

Tom writes that

The 'modern technology is hurting our brain' argument is widespread but it seems so short-sighted. It's based on the idea that before digital communication technology came along, people spent their time focusing on single tasks for hours on end and were rarely distracted.


Tom is replying to an article in Wired where Maggie Jackson who has written a book on the subject says that modern life

It's not a pretty picture: a never-ending stream of phone calls, e-mails, instant messages, text messages and tweets is part of an institutionalized culture of interruption, and makes it hard to concentrate and think creatively.

I have a lot of sympathy with Maggie's opinion as many people will testify that the information revolution has not led to an increase in leisure time but instead to making us slaves of production.

But back to Tom who believes that

the ability to focus on a single task, relatively uninterrupted, is the strange anomaly in the history of our psychological development.


The last 50 years have been a blip in human development for technology has let us concentrate on single tasking.Now the digital explosion means that human kind is back on track

Thursday, February 12, 2009

The challenge of the digital news room

Karl Schneider from Reed Business information writes a very good piece on his blog about the transformation to the digital newsroom mentality.

Whilst we've done a lot of work with our writers over the past couple of years, helping them to transform themselves into digital journalists, so far we haven't talked very much about the future for the people who work on our production desks.
he writes

One of the challenges he continues

is to help today's magazine production staff to make the transition to these new online roles.


1.For publishers, it will take a commitment to providing the training and the space to lean these new skills.

2.For production desk staff it will take a genuine willingness to re-learn their craft, sometimes giving up cherished roles and practices.