Showing posts with label Telegraph. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Telegraph. Show all posts

Sunday, February 14, 2010

A non story in the Sunday Telegraph

Oh dear,another expenses story from the BBC fills the front page of the Telegraph.

This time it is the amazing fact that it paid hundreds of its staff more than £100,000 last year despite its leaders' claims that the corporation is run efficiently.

The paper has obtained the 100K list which details 300 of the top salaries paid at the corporation.

It reveals that

the total cost of the high earners' salaries was the equivalent of the television licence fees paid by 400,000 households.


And ?????????

Friday, November 27, 2009

A new digital direction for the Telegraph

Yesterday it was anounced that the Telegraph's editor Will Lewis will be moving upstairs so to speak.

He will be managing a new digital division at the paper which will be tasked with creating cutting-edge ideas and new revenue streams.

He explains to New Media Age what the role entails

“Over the last three to five years we’ve established an integrated way of working. Because of that we’ve stepped on the gas and asked how we can do even better at creating digital products and services and new digital revenue streams. We spent quite a while thinking about it. It’s about setting up a new base camp and being able to draw on the resource here in Victoria and to use the brand if we choose and to use the content if we choose as well. While innovation continues in Victoria, we will take a different path to hunt down digital revenues in the new operation in Euston.

Monday, June 29, 2009

Telegraph editor is adamant he did the right thing over expenses

It was interesting to hear Will Lewis' comments yesterday on the Telegraph's exposure of MP's expenses.

The Telegraph's editor clearly believes that his paper has performed a public good by making Parliament more open and giving the electorate the chance to make a clean sweep with the old practices and denying that their publication has undermined democracy.

For my mind there have been two problems in the coverage.Firstly that there was no differentiation between claims that were accepted or rejected.Secondly that the paper has been selective in the members that it has targeted.

In particular the coverage over the first weekend which concentrated on the Labour party.

This gave the weekend papers time to mull over the implications from only one side of the political spectrum.It turned out that many Tory claims were far more outrageous than those of the Labour party.

Whatever the implications of the paper's actions,and its ramifications will be with us for many years,Lewis has set a precedent in publishing.

Monday, May 11, 2009

Telegraph succeeds in social media

Quite remarkable figures from Julian Sambles who has revealed to Malcolm Coles that the Telegraph Group gets 8 per cent of its traffic via social media.

Julain is head of audience development at the Telegraph group

The Telegraph got about 28 million unique visitors in March, which means social sites are sending it almost 75,000 unique visitors a day.


The figure says Malcolm show

1. How important social sites are becoming as a source of traffic.

2. And how well the Telegraph has engaged with them, with functionality like its Digg widget (EG see my post 'Telegraph tops Digg list') and Twitterfall box (despite the recent Twackdown with the Guardian).

Fourth Estate or Political agenda?

It is quite surprising how journalism ethics seem to have been conveniently pushed aside as the public is subjected to days of information on MP's expenses.

Let's not though forget the basics.A national newspaper has paid money for information that has been obtained by illegal means

As Charlie Beckett says

Cheque-book journalism by a right wing newspaper has laid a Labour Government low and yet no-one seems to be blaming the media with any success. The charge of corruption, indifference and disdain levelled at the politicians of all colours seems to have too much resonance for anyone to worry seriously about the messenger.


Yet the implications could be far reaching.There is even some talk of a general election having to be called.

Let's just examine the Telegraph.

It could be accused of cynically exploiting the timings of its release to undermine a Labour government.Release Labour figures for the weekend papers to mull over and when the public has had enough,release the Tory ones which by all accounts are as bad.

Secondly release information that could be seen to be misleading,and without giving its victims a right to reply.How many codes of conduct does that break?

Yes there is the public interest aspect.This information will be portrayed as the fourth estate keeping our political masters under scrutiny as is its role.Yet I question whether this was done for that fact or to play a particular political agenda by the Telegraph

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Some great photography


The Telegraph has a remarkable seeries of photographs which capture a suicide bombing in Sri Lanka.

The paper says that

The suicide bomber had approached the ministers on a bicycle before the explosion which killed three local politicians and three students

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Channel 4 has an enemy

The Telegraph's Iain Martin has asked in the light of this morning's Ofcom report,what is the point of Channel 4?

I don't think that the paper has ever been a great fan of the channel ever since the bad language that greeted the opening episodes of Brookside but according to Iain,

I can see that there is a point to its existence for all of the people who work for it in that big shiny building in Horseferry Road. But I'm struggling to work out what's in it for the rest of us.
It claims a public service element, but I'm a member of the public and I haven't been served by it for years.


Oh Dear,it seems the Iranian president head to head with the Queen may have been the final straw

If it goes off air, the old test card could be shown in its place. That would provide more of a public service than the existing Channel 4.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Telegraph outsources to Sydney as it shops around the world for costs saving initiatives

Jeff Jarvis tips us off to this article which appears in the Sydney morning herald and will no doubt send more shudders through the journalistic community.

The paper reports that

The Daily Telegraph has outsourced some of its production work to the other end of the world, with several of its weekly sections to be processed in suburban Sydney.
adding that

In an attempt to cut costs in the dramatic advertising downturn that is hurting media companies worldwide, the Telegraph Media Group decided to outsource sections of its flagship newspaper such as the travel, motoring and money pages and parts of The Sunday Telegraph. It chose Pagemasters, a company owned by the news agency Australian Associated Press, to do the job


Ed Roussel has confirmed the news to Jeff saying that

Reducing the cost of manufacturing and distribution is an imperative for any newspaper group that is determined to remain profitable, as we are. This is a great time to be shopping around the world for value-for-money partners.

Friday, December 12, 2008

Technology is the servant of journalism, not its master.Discuss

As if the Barclay twins do not have enough on their plates with the problems over Sark,now they have Roy Greenslade to contend with


Day by day, in print - and, especially, online - the Daily Telegraph is desperately trying to be the Daily Mail, but it cannot achieve it because it lacks the political and social passion that drives the Mail (and its readers).
Not that the Barclays show signs of understanding that. They have bought an institution and probably think they have been "modernising" it simply by making a lot of noise about engaging with the digital revolution.
But technology is the servant of journalism, not its master. There is no point in putting yards of editorial on a website merely to attract hits if that material is inimical to the paper's ethos. It undermines a news brand's trust and credibility.
Before it's too late - and maybe, just maybe, it already is - someone needs to explain to the brothers where they are going wrong. Anyone prepared to tell them, I wonder?

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Will there be any opinion left at the Telegraph?

Guido is reporing that

Dan Hannan has been dropped as a leader writer and will now only "be doing occasional articles".


Dan is not the first of the feature writers to leave the paper

Craig Brown, AN Wilson and Iain Dale have all just got the chop in what the paper's insiders are claiming is all about economics rather than editorial tone. The "business model" is changing one source tells Guido. If you lose the paper's character and spirit, you will lose readers.

Monday, September 08, 2008

Lewis on how the Telegraph is after all a happy place to work

In the face of gloomy news from the newspaper industry the Independent carries an upbeat interview with the Telegraph's editor Will Lewis who maintains following its colour relaunch last week that

"In essence, what we have done is put a group of highly talented journalists in a room and asked them to get on with it. We have provided the means for them to express themselves in paper, online, down a mobile phone and in distribution outlets that we haven't yet announced. That is now working brilliantly. We are a united operation in a way that I haven't experienced before in newspapers


And rebutes accusations that his newsroom is the gloomiest amongst the nationals

How can a paper be so bloody brilliant? How can a website be growing at a rate of 109 per cent a year, if we've got unhappy staff? It doesn't add up to me,"
adding that

It's a professional place. There's no glass ceiling, no concrete ceiling. People talk about morale and unhappiness, I can't compute that

Monday, August 18, 2008

Telegraph shuts its Berlin bureau

Another sign of the diminishing place of the foreign correspondent in the newspaper industry.
The Telegraph is to close its Berlin bureau

leaving it reports the Guardian

with just one staff correspondent in Europe as two more journalists leave its foreign news desk.
Berlin correspondent Harry de Quettville is to return to TMG's London headquarters after less than 18 months in Berlin to take a job in the features department.

Monday, March 24, 2008

What the media columnists are saying

The Guardian looks this morning at the media coverage of the Tibet crisis.

Steven Sarkur reports on a familiar aspect of China

The jammers, the plug-pullers and the internet blockers are hard at work in Beijing. The strategy is crude but effective and this is how it works. As I watched my colleagues on BBC World report on the riots in Tibet two weeks ago, the television in my Beijing hotel suddenly went dark. No test card, no patriotic music, just a blank screen and silence. When the Tibet report was done, back came the picture.


Pointing out that in the next few months

hundreds of journalists will head to China in the run-up to the Beijing Games. As the last couple of weeks have illustrated, the Olympics represents not just an opportunity for China to showcase its achievements and global status, but also for opponents of the dictatorship to garner unprecedented attention. Covering the former will be straightforward; reporting the latter, and putting it in context, will be anything but.


And in the same paper,Jonathan Watts tells of the hardships of repoting

The pitfalls are enormous. Political sensitivities over Tibet can hardly be greater than in Olympics year. The two sides - the Chinese leadership in Beijing and the Dalai Lama's government-in-exile in Dharamsala, India - are projecting vastly different interpretations of what is happening. Casualty figures, arrests, riot-damage and paramilitary violence are all disputed. The only way to be sure of anything is to see it with your own eyes. But even that has been impossible for most journalists most of the time.


Steven Glover at the Indy looks at the controversial remarks of Bill Deedes over the Barclay's brothers and the Telegraph's handling of it

Coming from anyone this would be inflammatory. Coming from Bill, a natural courtier who had cheerfully adapted to previous changes of regime in journalism and politics without demur, it was absolutely amazing. The Daily Telegraph had a choice. It could denounce the book, and in particular his remarks about the Barclays, as the ravings of a senile old fool. Or it could buy it for serialisation, ensuring that no other newspaper would run the embarrassing bits. Wisely, it did the latter, paying a handsome sum for first, second and third rights, so that no one else could have a further bite.


The newspaper'shandling of another incident is frowned on by Peter Wilby in the Guardian

Most newspapers virtually ignored the extraordinary apology by Express Newspapers' four national titles to the parents of Madeleine McCann. I am not surprised. The sin to which the Express titles confessed - presenting gossip and hearsay as hard news - has become the staple of downmarket journalism and is infecting upmarket papers too. It is accompanied by casual cruelty and a highly judgmental tone.
and the PCC comes in for critisism

The PCC also lacks teeth: it has no power to fine papers, call for resignations, or act without a specific complaint from a directly aggrieved party.


Andrew Keen writes that

Today, we are all teetering on the precipice of life after television – our media habits being radically transformed by devices like the notebook PC, the video mobile phone and the high-resolution iPod touch. New platforms like the internet and mobile are breaking television's monopoly on the distribution of home entertainment. Even today's television – with its set-top box, its pay-per-view programming and web-browsing functionality – no longer resembles the old telly that we grew up with.
but says

It is hard to think what comes next.


Finally it is 40 years since the birth of satirical comedy and Andrew Fettis in the Independent says

Many people are claimed to have changed the face of British comedy. Forty years ago, aged only 27, David Frost actually did.


And Frost is interviewed in the Guardian

Are there any interviewees who have eluded him? "I had been trying to get Fidel Castro forever, really. I don't know how ill he is now, but I would love to interview Castro before he goes," he says. "And at the moment, the new Russian leader is somewhat interesting."
He also wonders what he would do if he secured an interview with Osama bin Laden. "Your citizen's duty and your journalist's duty clash. You should try and carry out a citizen's arrest really, but you might not last very long. If you did the interview and conspired not to reveal where it was, that would be a disservice to freedom."

Sunday, March 16, 2008

A blast from the grave?

This morning's Independent claims that the late Bill Deedes did not hold the owners of the Telegraph in high regard.

Quoting from Stephen Robinson's biography, The Remarkable Lives of Bill Deedes, to be published on 27 March it claims,

he was so disillusioned following the arrival in 2004 of the reclusive Barclay brothers, Sir David and Sir Frederick, as owners, that he considered resigning, believing the new regime to be "a stinking mob" and "bullying".


And speaking of their plans which included staff cuts and bringing in staff from the Mail,

"This was a newspaper they were ready to pay £660m for but it was being produced by an unsatisfactory staff. "Not a word of encouragement or praise came the way of the journalists who produced this high-value newspaper, though reason suggests they must have had something to do with what the Barclays had paid."

Monday, March 03, 2008

How times are changing at the Telegraph.


This morning's Telegraph devotes a big spread on page 9 to the "marriage "of Tory MP Alan Duncan and James Dunseath

The paper reports that

A senior member of David Cameron's team is to become the first Conservative MP to enter into a civil partnership.
Alan Duncan, the shadow business secretary, will make political history with his announcement in The Daily Telegraph today.Mr Duncan, 50, an MP since 1992, will be the first member of the Cabinet or shadow cabinet to have entered into a legal partnership with a same-sex partner



I like Guido's comment


Alan Duncan is tying the knot with James Dunseath it is announced on the Court & Social page of the Telegraph. Some serious social changes are encapsulated in that, not so long ago the only Queen on that page was Elizabeth II, and the letters pages were full of outrage at gay marriages.

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Telegraph goes undercover and excels


The Sunday Telegraph can be applauded this morning for its investigation into child trafficking.It is not often that the voice of the establishment crusades against hunanitarian issues but its front page splash today by undercover reporter David Harrison reveals



An undercover reporter was offered several children for sale by their parents in Nigeria: two boys aged three and five for £5,000, or £2,500 for one, and a 10-month-old baby for £2,000. Teenage girls - including some still pregnant - were willing to sell their babies for less than £1,000.
One international trafficker, tracked down in Lagos, claimed to be buying up to 500 children a year.
Impoverished African parents are being lured by the traffickers' promises of "a better life" for their children, thousands of miles away in cities including London, Birmingham and Manchester.
But, once brought to Britain, the children are used as a fraudulent means to obtain illicit housing and other welfare benefits, totalling tens of thousands of pounds each a year.


Check out the Telegraph Tv piece which you can also access on the same page

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

New Political Blog at the Telegraph


Not a bad day to start really for political gossip.

Vince Cable's remark at PMQ'S was a classic

“This House has noted the Prime Minister’s remarkable transformation from Stalin to Mr Bean in the past few weeks.”



Check out THREE LINE WHIP

Thursday, November 08, 2007

Telegraph asks how important is blogging

Shane Richmond blogs about a conference at the Telegraph yesterday evening when the question was asked how important is political blogging

Here are his opening remarks

In their introductions several panellists focused on the perception that British political blogging lags behind America. Lloyd Shepherd suggested this might be because the BBC has a chilling effect on political debate in this country but others disagreed, suggesting that it will take an election before British political bloggers come into their own.
John Kampfner, editor of the New Statesman talked about the difficulty for traditional media of delivering online content that is fast and accessible but which also retains the rigour expected of long established brands.

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

How the papers report the same news



For a really good analysis of the news values of our nationals,this morning's reports on Government's Migration Impact Forum

All report it,but concentrate on different ways on what they believe is its impact.

I have produced the first three paragraphs of the reports below


Guardian

Migrants are more skilled and often more reliable and hardworking than British workers, and are fuelling the country's economic growth to the tune of £6bn a year, according to the first official study of their impact published yesterday.
The report for the government's Migration Impact Forum also concludes that migrants on average earn more and so pay more tax than UK workers.


Times

Migrants are more reliable and harder working than British-born workers and are boosting economic output by £6 billion a year, according to a government study published yesterday.
Immigrants have a better work ethic than the British and are willing to work longer hours with less time off sick. Weekly mean earnings of migrants are also £60 higher than their UK counterparts.
But while large numbers of migrants bring overall economic benefits, their arrival may be hitting the wage levels of the unskilled, the study found.


Telegraph

Immigrant workers are both higher paid and more reliable than their British counterparts and contributed £6 billion to economic growth last year, a Government study said yesterday.
Migrants earned £424 a week on average, compared with £395 for UK workers, and paid more in tax than they consumed in services.
However, a separate paper issued together with the study by the Home Office admitted there were complaints about the impact of immigration on housing and other public services. Liam Byrne, the immigration minister, said the research showed that ''in the long run, our country and Exchequer are better off with immigration rather than without it".


Independent

Migrant workers contributed £6 billion to the country's economic growth last year and earned higher wages than their British counterparts, Home Office figures revealed yesterday.
The study concluded that new arrivals were harder-working, brought sought-after skills and paid more in tax than they used in public services.


Mail

Immigrants are placing a huge strain on public services, Labour finally admitted last night.
Crime is up, schools are struggling to cope with Eastern European children, community tensions are rising, health services are coming under enormous pressure and house prices are being driven up, the Government said.
The findings, based on a survey of public sector workers, are the first published by ministers after ten years of an 'open door' immigration policy.


Express

Many UK regions have reported concerns about the impact of immigration on housing, crime and health, according to a study on migrants from eastern Europe.
Feedback from the Government's regional co-ordination groups, to be presented to the Migration Impact Forum (MIF) in Whitehall, said migrants are putting pressure on the housing market and driving up rents, creating increased demand on GPs and contributing to tensions in the community.


Sun

LABOUR admitted last night that mass immigration strained our housing, schools and healthcare.
Immigration minister Liam Byrne said the influx had been “unsettling” for some areas.
And he admitted removing exit checks was a “mistake” – as now we do not know how many illegal immigrants are here.
He said the checks would be started again.
His comments came as a Home Office report revealed migrants boosted the economy by £6billion last year


Interesting.Only the Times led with the story,but the Guardian covered it on its second front page piece.Both those papers concentrated on the benefits in their openings,but the Times brings a negative effect on wage levels.The Indy was similar in its positive outlok as was the Telegraph which also introduced the second report on the impact on housing and public services.

Then to the red tops,no sign of the report in the Mirror,the Sun leading with the negatives as did the Express and the Mail which made no mention of the positives.

Surprising,not really